More specifically, a discourse community is a community where
there is a general consensus of what the community represents and what type of
people belong to it according to its dynamic.
As we analyzed the concept of the discourse community I
realized that an interesting discourse community I believe to be a part of is
that of the international students at Northeastern, or Boston, in general.
Being an international student involves leaving your home
country, native culture and language all behind to emerge yourself in something
polar to what you are used to. Once my career at Northeastern began, just
during the first two days I had met individuals, members of my international
student community and friends from around 30 different countries, all of which
where represented by the individual his or herself.
Swale's first concept of a discourse community is the fact that
everyone in the community must have a general idea of what the community is,
and in this case, it was explicitly the comfort zone for all international
students who felt like home was now in a completely different country. This
allowed for most or all international students create a web of interaction and
connection through social medias and orientation activities, which leads to
Swale's second pillar for a discourse community. "A discourse community
has mechanisms of intercommunication among its members". Members of a
community cannot share the same idea or common knowledge if they are not
constantly interacting. As we mentioned in class, face to face interaction is
becoming less and less important compared to technological mechanisms that are
rapidly becoming the principal method of communication among members of the
community. When school is not in session for vacations, international students
interact through Facebook when traveling is not always a possibility.
Additionally, Swales explains how a discourse community utilizes and
posseses one or more genre among the common knowledge within its members. This
means that there are several rotating matters that concern the population of
the community. In the case of the international student community, a genre
ranges from the different languages spoken by the different members of the
community and how they sub-divide among them, same with countries of origin,
or, collective visa matters in which the International Student and Scholar
Institute at Northeastern plays a vital role since it is the organization on
campus that holds all important matters for the community, therefore presenting
itself as a genre as well, and an important location and hub for the discourse
community.
When members of a community abundantly
interact with each other, the type of language used in common conversations
begins to evolve into becoming more casual according to the standards of the
relationship and a more casual lexis is created due to the types of
conversations taking place. In the case of the International students, the
lexis created involves places where international students interact with each
other like restaurants, cafes, discotheques such as Venu and Rumor, bars or houses of distinct
members of the community where gatherings occur. Also, returning to the idea of
the regional sub-division of international students, lexis can be created when
members of the community come from regions where the vocabulary used is the
same, therefore common designations are used in daily conversation for ideas or
concrete things among other members.
Lastly,
the discourse community's membership is constantly evolving as
"individuals enter as apprentices and leave" when graduation time
arrives and one is not a student anymore. However, the communication and
networking is constantly stimulated by technology advances.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteAndres, I agree with your analysis of the international students at NU as a discourse community. Being an international student myself, and having many friends who are international students as well, I can understand how you connect Swales' different characteristics to our community. The only point I would argue on is that do all of the international students have an agreed set of common public goals? Yes, we all are students striving to earn degrees in our respective fields, and that could be a common goal but, does that classify solely the international students as a discourse community or does that more broadly describe all the students at Northeastern? Nonetheless, I do see how international students easily meet the other five criteria stated by Swales and do appreciate your analysis.
ReplyDelete