The idea of a public has changed drastically over the years
as technological advances have increased our ability to communicate to a vast
audience without being physically present. While telephones and mail have long
removed the need for face to face communication, the invention and
proliferation of the Internet has brought anonymous discourse to a new level. This
has led to the advent of large anonymous message boards and content browsing
sites such as reddit and 4chan which, despite having few to no members of known
identity, have grown huge public audiences with their own popular opinions and
perspectives.
This
anonymity allows the members to produce content without serious concern for how
they will be perceived by the public towards which their discourse is directed.
While certainly their purpose in posting communications is to insight a certain
set of reactions depending on the topic, they are able to take more risks, as
they need not fear criticism or unwanted reactions on their actual identity. This
in a way creates a different kind of privacy that allows for interaction with
many different people that does not include many of the drawbacks of producing a
work for a public setting.
While anonymous discourse communities do
protect the users from attack on their personal reputation, it also prevents
one from getting credit for inspiring and useful contributions and takes away
from the ethos and tone of the piece.
For example, had Chris Kluwe’s letter been submitted anonymously it
would likely have been largely ignored or assumed to be written by just another
gay marriage activist. By overtly communicating that he is the author of this
piece, Kluwe’s letter is not only given more attention, but it also affects
Kluwe’s reputation and persona while giving him credit for a well written
response.
The
additional freedom of communicating anonymously through public Internet forums
creates opportunities for people to take on different personas and say things,
which they would normally not want to say to people in real life. While this
can be as minor as expressing an unpopular opinion, it has also created Internet
trolling and bullying because the anonymity prevents bad consequences for the
user. While there are dangerous side effects of anonymity, proper education
about Internet use and online security can mitigate the risks.
This freedom is not all bad though
because the diversity of viewpoints this propagates in Internet communities
creates increasingly intricate and insightful content and discussion. Experts,
celebrities, and regular members can come together to create some very
informative posts which vividly explain complicated and nebulous topics in ways
that anyone can understand.
Overall, I think the increase in
anonymous communication and the creation of wholly anonymous communities adds a
third element to this dichotomy of public vs. private spheres. It draws the
line in the middle between these two and takes some positive and negative
aspects from both, creating a unique space. This space has led to innovative
discourse communities and loads of unique content that may not have been realized
without the rise of the Internet. In this way anonymous communication will
continue to shape our society and pop culture in
Adam -
ReplyDeleteThe power of anonymity on the Internet is such a powerful, yet sometimes abused, tool. As you mention above, there is a strange balance between the benefits of being able to share ideas, and the abuse of such power in the form of bullying, or worse, lying. As we begin to understand the extent to which these tools can be utilized, I think people are also realizing the damage they can do when they are abused. I have to agree that the Internet has enabled many interesting discussions and that tools like Facebook have changed the way humans communicate irrevocably. A lot of good has come from the technological advancements in communication. At the same time, as users of these technologies, we have to be weary of the content we produce and the fact that it will most likely be distorted.